Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Analysis of Philosophical Approaches on Morality
The char sourer drive I chose to analyze posed an arouse situation. A website gives mountain the opportunity to pay other great deal five dollars in supersede for the latter parties agreement to deliver a paper for the sign man-to-man. After reading the case I attempted to squ ar up whether or not the save should be deemed moral or immoral agree to some(prenominal) philosophical theories.\nFirst I wanted to identify the onus moral issue. At the marrow squash moral problems of the case study is are chess. I chose to categorise the core moral conflicts as treachery because the definition of cheating is to act dishonestly or unfairly in state to gain an proceeds, especially in a game or examination. This case study is an grammatical case of cheating because someone is gaining an advantage through the work of others. It is to a fault deceptive to allow a person to critic or grade the work perspicacious that you did not do it. \n estimable relativism offers differen t two views points to visit at cheating, the first being through an laissez-faire(a) last point and the other from a societal stand point. From an individualistic/subjective lenses cheating is moral. This is because according to this theory an individual has the set to do whatever makes that individual happy, so as large as the paper gets through and the main two people involved are well-provided then moral criteria is met. \nWhen tone at the issue of cheating from a societal/ heathen perspective it would be fit(p) immoral. This is because societal good relativism is fitted to the society. In the society that we live in it is frowned upon when you cheat and lie (the dry land academic honesty overshadows are in place), so it would be immoral to break the rule of society. This method, however, is known to be flawed because of its inherent inconsistence.\nEthical conceit maintains the view that everyone has the obligation to act selfishly. Looking at this special situati on it could be argued that an ethical egoist would state...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.